Joao Fonseca vs Zizou Bergs Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve effectiveness shows Fonseca slightly ahead, winning 47.4% of points compared to Bergs' 46.52% over the last 6 months. Does this indicate an advantage for Fonseca in tight sets? Yes, albeit marginal.
• When it comes to returning opponents' second serves, Bergs has a small edge, claiming 44.59% of such points versus Fonseca's 43.25%.
• Both players are nearly identical in returning first serves, with Fonseca slightly more effective at 24.44% compared to Bergs' 24.39%.
• Crucial under pressure, Bergs saves 57.29% of breakpoints, while Fonseca is marginally better at 57.77%. Could this be decisive in high-stakes moments? Yes, it narrows the gap further.
• In terms of overall match-wins over the past year, Fonseca leads with a 70.77% win rate, outpacing Bergs' 58.82%.
• Surface preferences may influence outcomes: Bergs thrives on Grass with a 68% win rate, while Fonseca excels on Hard courts, winning 76%.
• At different competition levels, Bergs competes mainly on the Main tour with a 65% success rate, whereas Fonseca dominates Challenger/ITF events, winning 75.86%.
• When facing opponents, Bergs contests with higher-ranked players, averaging a rank of 106.97, compared to Fonseca's average opponent rank of 112.38.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Bergs could have the upper hand, having won 60% of such scenarios versus Fonseca's 57% in the past year.
• Converting breakpoints can shift the pace of the game, with Bergs converting 31.64% in recent matches, compared to 28.47% for Fonseca.

Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming match between Bergs and Fonseca is defined by fine margins, as reflected in their recent performances and statistical indicators.

Fonseca has shown a moderate lead in second serve efficiency and overall win percentage over the past year, potentially giving him a slight competitive edge.

However, Bergs' superior breakpoint conversion rate and consistent success against higher-ranked players suggest his aptitude in navigating challenging matches. His better record in deciding sets further tilts the balance in his favor when the match approaches its climax.

While surface preference favors Bergs on grass and Fonseca on hard courts, both have maintained robust performances in respective competitive environments. With an evenly matched return game and break-point resilience, the battle could pivot on critical moments.

Ultimately, the deciding factors appear to lean slightly toward Bergs, whose experience and tactical execution, especially under pressure, makes him the likely winner of this encounter.